Andy Carroll

is in trouble again

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11678_6452395,00.html

Bedshammer wrote:is in trouble again

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11678_6452395,00.html

Carroll has denied the offence, claiming self-defence, the court heard.

With fairness, we don't know what happened. She could've gone at him something.

Ezekiel 25:17 wrote:With fairness, we don't know what happened. She could've gone at him something.

Any guy that assaults a women is nothing but a low life immature. TWAT.

No matter what the reason.

So if a woman came at you with say, a knife (not too far fetched if it's a domestic incident) you wouldn't defend yourself with any force?

Ezekiel 25:17 wrote:So if a woman came at you with say, a knife (not too far fetched if it's a domestic incident) you wouldn't defend yourself with any force?

the object would be to restrain the women in that case, not assault her. I had domestics with my ex where she would try to hit me with something (i remember getting a whack round the head with a bowl once ) and i would grab her arms and hold her back or something, pushed her into the spare room once and closed the door on her, that doesn't mean you then start to beat the shite out of them.

Ezekiel 25:17 wrote:So if a woman came at you with say, a knife (not too far fetched if it's a domestic incident) you wouldn't defend yourself with any force?

He is from the Black Country they haven't got knives there yet

Avfc_4eva_Sotc wrote:

Ezekiel 25:17 wrote:So if a woman came at you with say, a knife (not too far fetched if it's a domestic incident) you wouldn't defend yourself with any force?

the object would be to restrain the women in that case, not assault her. I had domestics with my ex where she would try to hit me with something (i remember getting a whack round the head with a bowl once ) and i would grab her arms and hold her back or something, pushed her into the spare room once and closed the door on her, that doesn't mean you then start to beat the shite out of them.

Well said AVFC.

Lionheart wrote:

Ezekiel 25:17 wrote:So if a woman came at you with say, a knife (not too far fetched if it's a domestic incident) you wouldn't defend yourself with any force?

He is from the Black Country they haven't got knives there yet

yer i know we only have sporks here.

Avfc_4eva_Sotc wrote:

Ezekiel 25:17 wrote:So if a woman came at you with say, a knife (not too far fetched if it's a domestic incident) you wouldn't defend yourself with any force?

the object would be to restrain the women in that case, not assault her. I had domestics with my ex where she would try to hit me with something (i remember getting a whack round the head with a bowl once ) and i would grab her arms and hold her back or something, pushed her into the spare room once and closed the door on her, that doesn't mean you then start to beat the shite out of them.

Which legally is assault. Let the court judge him before we do.

Ezekiel 25:17 wrote:

Avfc_4eva_Sotc wrote:

Ezekiel 25:17 wrote:So if a woman came at you with say, a knife (not too far fetched if it's a domestic incident) you wouldn't defend yourself with any force?

the object would be to restrain the women in that case, not assault her. I had domestics with my ex where she would try to hit me with something (i remember getting a whack round the head with a bowl once ) and i would grab her arms and hold her back or something, pushed her into the spare room once and closed the door on her, that doesn't mean you then start to beat the shite out of them.

Which legally is assault. Let the court judge him before we do.

what a load of tosh.

Ezekiel 25:17 wrote:So if a woman came at you with say, a knife (not too far fetched if it's a domestic incident) you wouldn't defend yourself with any force?

By the time you'd have thought about it, considered all of the consequences and asked advice on facebook, you'd have more holes in you than a tea bag

QBVILLA wrote:

Ezekiel 25:17 wrote:So if a woman came at you with say, a knife (not too far fetched if it's a domestic incident) you wouldn't defend yourself with any force?

By the time you'd have thought about it, considered all of the consequences and asked advice on facebook, you'd have more holes in you than a tea bag

Only one way to get him off Facebook......









Advertise jobs there!

Avfc_4eva_Sotc wrote:

Ezekiel 25:17 wrote:So if a woman came at you with say, a knife (not too far fetched if it's a domestic incident) you wouldn't defend yourself with any force?

the object would be to restrain the women in that case, not assault her. I had domestics with my ex where she would try to hit me with something (i remember getting a whack round the head with a bowl once ) and i would grab her arms and hold her back or something, pushed her into the spare room once and closed the door on her, that doesn't mean you then start to beat the shite out of them.

You put up with all that shit and then she dumped you!!

Someone set his car on fire yesterday.

Ezekiel 25:17 wrote:

Avfc_4eva_Sotc wrote:

Ezekiel 25:17 wrote:So if a woman came at you with say, a knife (not too far fetched if it's a domestic incident) you wouldn't defend yourself with any force?

the object would be to restrain the women in that case, not assault her. I had domestics with my ex where she would try to hit me with something (i remember getting a whack round the head with a bowl once ) and i would grab her arms and hold her back or something, pushed her into the spare room once and closed the door on her, that doesn't mean you then start to beat the shite out of them.

Which legally is assault. Let the court judge him before we do.

so that guy that pulled your sisters hair and you threw him to the ground after having this 3 min thinking of what would happen to me (in 10 seconds) and then he ran of like a baby your words...then you all asked us did you do the right thing,,,well your answer smacks of being a hypocrite

Sorry dan did'nt realise you had said almost the same....glass house and all that eze...you must live in a big one

Yeah Mark, the difference being none of know what happened between Carrol and his missus...... Innocent until proven guilty and what not.