Craig Bellamy or Robbie Keane..

Out of the two who would you prefer at Villa Park..

Bellamy is a but worked well under Hughes and wasnt any trouble (reportedly) in his loan spell under Martin at Celtic.. I would rather buy Bellamy then Keane.. and we need a nasty player in our team..

I think Bellamy will end up at Spurs and Keane at Villa..

ADRIAN_1976 wrote:Out of the two who would you prefer at Villa Park..

Bellamy is a but worked well under Hughes and wasnt any trouble (reportedly) in his loan spell under Martin at Celtic.. I would rather buy Bellamy then Keane.. and we need a nasty player in our team..

I think Bellamy will end up at Spurs and Keane at Villa..

Neither, but if I had to pick one it would be Keane, because Bellamy is far to injury prone. A fit Bellamy I would definitely prefer.

Bellamy is an unpleasant sicknote. The number of clubs he's played for says a lot. Having said that, I'm not sure that Keane's any better.

Bedshammer wrote:Bellamy is an unpleasant sicknote. The number of clubs he's played for says a lot. Having said that, I'm not sure that Keane's any better.

I think Robbie has played for 6 clubs now and is 28. He has been at the spuds for 7 years... I have no idea how we kept him so long.

FrenchSpur wrote:

Bedshammer wrote:Bellamy is an unpleasant sicknote. The number of clubs he's played for says a lot. Having said that, I'm not sure that Keane's any better.

I think Robbie has played for 6 clubs now and is 28. He has been at the spuds for 7 years... I have no idea how we kept him so long.

Apart from his spell at Liverpool. That was an odd business.

FrenchSpur wrote:

Bedshammer wrote:Bellamy is an unpleasant sicknote. The number of clubs he's played for says a lot. Having said that, I'm not sure that Keane's any better.

I think Robbie has played for 6 clubs now and is 28. He has been at the spuds for 7 years... I have no idea how we kept him so long.

I agree, and that's what bothers me about Keane, he's hardly been first choice at Spurs and for me above every other position on the park a striker has to be hungry, has to want to play in every game, needs goals, and Keane comes across as being quite happy as a squad player, that's a lot of money for a bench player and to say he would then be good enough for a Villa fronting bothers me.

FrenchSpur, are you female or male, i don't get that other thread.

I would take either, to be honest. Dont think Keane is happy to be a squad player to be honest, though am concerned he is past his best. Could link up well with Gabby, though personally I would like to see Ashley in the position behind Gabby.

I thought Bellamy was superb for Man City, knob, but a good player

villanfromluton wrote:I would take either, to be honest. Dont think Keane is happy to be a squad player to be honest, though am concerned he is past his best. Could link up well with Gabby, though personally I would like to see Ashley in the position behind Gabby.

I thought Bellamy was superb for Man City, knob, but a good player

Yep, Bellamy, its like he punishes you for his talent and lets face it, at times he's up there with the best, Keane......not sure.